Research Paper · Review Draft v3 New May 2026 · English · Te Reo Māori · Deutsch

Sovereign-Record Architecture for Community-Scale Platforms

A research paper reporting an alternative substrate for community-scale platforms, in which the sovereignty a community needs is a property of the records themselves rather than a concession the operator may revoke. Cryptographic provenance, tenant-bounded policy enforcement, bilateral and bounded federation, member-driven sovereign portability, and a supervised participatory dialogue surface — running in production on EU-sovereign and New Zealand-sovereign infrastructure. Discharges the Te Tiriti governance duties Dr Taiuru’s Kaupapa Māori AI Framework asserts; engages the wider personhood inquiry he poses in the companion paper (Paper B — synopsis published).

Read HTML (EN/MI/DE) · Download PDF (EN/MI/DE) · Slideshow with presenter notes (EN) · CC BY 4.0 (on operator approval) →
Working Paper · V1.0 New DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19600614

Distributive Equity Through Structure: A Community-Scale Worked Example of Values Stickiness

A documentary case study offered to the legal-academic research programme on ecosystem power. Documents Village’s Tractatus-framework constitutional architecture as an enactment of values stickiness, grounded in Wittgenstein, Berlin, Ostrom, Alexander, and Te Ao Māori frameworks of indigenous data sovereignty.

Five languages (EN/DE/FR/NL/MI) · CC BY 4.0 · ORCID 0009-0005-2933-7170 →
Research Paper · Synopsis New May 2026 · English · Te Reo Māori · Deutsch · Français · 2-page synopsis

Situated Language Layers for Minority-Language and Indigenous Communities (Paper B Synopsis)

The empirical companion to Paper A. A per-tenant situated language layer trained on the tenant’s own corpus, governed by the tenant’s own authority, and operated on infrastructure inside the tenant’s jurisdictional reach. Five training-discipline rules empirically derived from the project’s thirteen cohorts; nine weight-modification ablation experiments motivating a strict no-weight-modification stance; five Tier-1 cohorts in production; CPU-fallback inference architecture keeping the runtime path entirely outside US-controlled infrastructure. This is the 2-page synopsis — the full empirical paper is deferred to a separate session with verified training-run data, per-cohort evaluation tables, and ablation-result detail.

Read HTML (EN/MI/DE/FR) · Download PDF (EN/MI/DE/FR) · Slideshow with presenter notes (EN) · CC BY 4.0 · companion to Paper A →
Companion Blog · Non-technical New May 2026 · English

Why a community needs its own trained AI, not a borrowed one — the why behind Paper B

A non-technical companion to Paper B. Paper A solved data sovereignty; Paper B is about the AI part. Why a community using a frontier vendor model imports the vendor’s authority along with the answers — and what to do instead. Five training-discipline rules learned the hard way; five tenant-type cohorts deployed today; CPU-fallback inference architecture on NZ-sovereign and EU-sovereign infrastructure.

Read the blog post →
Policy Brief · V0.1 New EU policy audience DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19635598

Sovereign AI Governance at Community Scale: An EU Policy Brief

A policy-audience derivative of the Distributive Equity whitepaper. Three mechanisms — Situated Language Layer, Guardian Agents, Federation — mapped onto the AI Act, EMFA, GDPR Article 9, DSA, and CLOUD Act. Structural audit criteria an adopting community or business can run for itself.

English & German · CC BY 4.0 · derived from the Distributive Equity whitepaper →
Article Series New

AI Governance for Communities — A Smaller Room Than You Think

Who decides what AI becomes, and by what authority? Philosophy, philanthropy, sovereignty, and practical governance — including Māori frameworks for data sovereignty and what action ordinary readers can take.

Five articles · CC BY 4.0 · mysovereignty.digital →
Companion Blog · Non-technical New May 2026 · English

Why a sovereign record architecture — the why behind the paper

A non-technical companion to Paper A, written for parish treasurers, rūnanga secretaries, family-history curators, and anyone responsible for community records on a US-owned platform. The platform exists, it runs on EU- and NZ-sovereign infrastructure today, and this page explains why it had to be built.

Read the blog post →