New Research Papers
- Paper A v3 Sovereign-Record Architecture for Community-Scale Platforms
- Paper B Situated Language Layers for Minority-Language and Indigenous Communities
- Policy Brief Sovereign AI Governance at Community Scale — EU Policy Brief
Some decisions require human judgment — architecturally enforced, not left to AI discretion, however well trained.
AI systems no longer just answer questions. They book flights, write to production databases, ship code, and act on data they did not author. As autonomy grows, the gap between what a user explicitly asked for and what a model statistically tends to do becomes the gap between an aligned outcome and a destructive one.
An agent runs with infrastructure access. A document loaded into its context carries instructions the user never wrote — and the model treats them as eligible. A statistical default silently shapes an action the user cannot easily inspect: Western individualist framing for a collectivist user, property-rights language for a Māori user asking about kaitiakitanga, utilitarian calculus for someone whose framework is religious. In autonomous loops, the failure is no longer a typo. It is a deleted database, a sent message, a code change shipped under the user’s name.
Safety through training alone cannot scale to action-taking systems. When a model is choosing — port number, cultural frame, tool to invoke, document to delete — the question is not whether it will sometimes choose wrong, but whether the architecture lets a wrong choice fire. Tractatus answers structurally: some decisions are gated, some are observable, some require human judgment before action.
Four intellectual traditions and the contemporary scholarship of Dr Karaitiana Taiuru — Berlin, Wittgenstein, Te Tiriti, Taiuru, Alexander.
Read the approachSix governance services in the critical path, plus four-phase Guardian Agents. Defence in depth across behavioural training, structural enforcement, and human oversight.
Read the architectureThe framework is presented through three lenses, each with distinct depth and focus.
Academic and technical depth
Code and integration guides
Strategic AI governance
Published research from the Tractatus framework programme.
An alternative substrate for community-scale platforms in which sovereignty is a property of the records themselves, not a concession the operator may revoke. Cryptographic provenance, tenant-bounded policy enforcement, bilateral and bounded federation, member-driven sovereign portability, and a supervised participatory dialogue surface.
Empirical companion to Paper A. Per-tenant situated language layer trained on the tenant’s own corpus, governed by the tenant’s own authority, on infrastructure inside the tenant’s jurisdictional reach. Five training-discipline rules empirically derived; nine weight-modification ablation experiments motivating a strict no-weight-modification stance.
A community-scale worked example of values stickiness. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19600614. Five languages. CC BY 4.0.
Policy-audience derivative of the Distributive Equity whitepaper. Three mechanisms mapped to EU regulatory hooks. English & German. CC BY 4.0.
STO-INN-0003 v2.1 | John Stroh & Claude (Anthropic) | January 2026
Full academic treatment with formal proofs, existential risk context, and comprehensive citations.
Read →Practical guide for organisations evaluating the framework for adoption.
Read →Regulatory strategy, certification infrastructure, and policy recommendations.
Read →PDF downloads:
From a port number incident to Guardian Agents and a sovereign-record architecture in production — seven months of research and engineering.
Koha (koh-hah) is a Māori practice of reciprocal giving that strengthens the bond between giver and receiver. This research is open access under Apache 2.0 — if it has value to you, your koha sustains its continuation.
All research, documentation, and code remain freely available regardless of contribution. Koha is not payment — it is participation in whanaungatanga (relationship-building) and manaakitanga (reciprocal care).